Box 35
Contains 10 Results:
Petition for a writ, 1939
Bridges was convicted of contempt of court for sending a telegram to the Secretary of Labor, which characterized the decision given in a case regarding a dispute between two unions as "outrageous."
Brief of American Civil Liberties Union, 1939
Bridges was convicted of contempt of court for sending a telegram to the Secretary of Labor, which characterized the decision given in a case regarding a dispute between two unions as "outrageous."
Brief on behalf of respondent, 1939
Bridges was convicted of contempt of court for sending a telegram to the Secretary of Labor, which characterized the decision given in a case regarding a dispute between two unions as "outrageous."
Petitioner's briefs, 1940-1941
Bridges was convicted of contempt of court for sending a telegram to the Secretary of Labor, which characterized the decision given in a case regarding a dispute between two unions as "outrageous."
Reply brief, 1940
Bridges was convicted of contempt of court for sending a telegram to the Secretary of Labor, which characterized the decision given in a case regarding a dispute between two unions as "outrageous."
Transcript of record, 1940
Bridges was convicted of contempt of court for sending a telegram to the Secretary of Labor, which characterized the decision given in a case regarding a dispute between two unions as "outrageous."
Petition for a writ of Habeas Corpus, 1942
Bridges was convicted of contempt of court for sending a telegram to the Secretary of Labor, which characterized the decision given in a case regarding a dispute between two unions as "outrageous."
Appellant's petition for rehearing, 1944
Bridges vs. I.F. Wixon was regarding Bridges' deportation trial in 1946. Leonard argued that evidence brought against Bridges insinuating he was a member of the Communist Party was insubstantial and unconstitutional.
Brief for Bridges, 1944
Bridges vs. I.F. Wixon was regarding Bridges' deportation trial in 1946. Leonard argued that evidence brought against Bridges insinuating he was a member of the Communist Party was insubstantial and unconstitutional.
Appellant's reply brief, 1944
Bridges vs. I.F. Wixon was regarding Bridges' deportation trial in 1946. Leonard argued that evidence brought against Bridges insinuating he was a member of the Communist Party was insubstantial and unconstitutional.